Thursday, April 25, 2013

The mythology of the Buddhist robe.

Togen's Zen Robe for 21st Century
 
  Whether I like it or not it seems today that one of the big issues in the West is the Buddhist robe. There is an ongoing spreading of old myths about the Buddhist robe, it’s origin and its significance. So I would like it if we all took a step back and considered some facts of history. 
   The first thing I would like to point out is that there were no representations and art of Buddha as a person until almost 400 years after his death. The fact is Buddhist had been instructed while Buddha was still alive not to make statues and pictures of him so that people would not be tempted to worship him as if he was some sort of man God. It wasn’t until almost the beginning of the second century CE that some pictures of him in human form began to appear. Until that time the Buddha was represented usually with symbols such as the Buddha's footprints.  We know that it was probably  not until the days of Alexander and the spread of Greek culture that statues of Buddha began to appear.
   We also know that even the first sutras were not written down until 200 years after Buddha had died. So even descriptions of the his clothing described in early sutras many of which are quite fantastic and fanciful are not based on any actual knowledge of what he wore. The fact is Buddha wasn’t a Buddhist he was a Hindu holy man. I recently read a blog by a nice lady that seems to think that Hindu holy men today wear something resembling the present day Buddhist robe.
     One thing we can be pretty certain of is what Hindu holy men wear now is pretty much what Hindu holy men wore than. Some Hindu holy men wear saffron robes and holy beads but these robes don’t look like Buddhist monk robes. The fact is that the majority of Hindu holy men wear a loincloth and that’s about it. Some wear a loincloth and a gold chain or gold bracelet. Many like the Nagas where nothing at all. You can get on the Internet and Google pictures of Hindu holy men and you get a clear idea of the way an ascetic in India dresses now and in Buddha's life time. If you can find a picture of a Hindu monk wearing a Kashaya robe you’ve done better than I ever have.
     I think anyone who gave the question any serious thought and was familiar with Buddhist history would probably guess as I am about to do that the first codified Buddhist robes were probably introduced by Ashoka Maurya (304–232 BCE) commonly known as Ashoka and also as Ashoka the Great, he was an Indian emperor of the Maurya Dynasty who ruled almost all of the Indian subcontinent from ca. 269 BCE to 232 BCE. Until Ashoka converted to Buddhism it was more or less a very small sect that primarily existed in local areas in northeastern India and what would now be Nepal. When the Ashoka converted he ruled the entire Indian subcontinent from north to south. He introduced many rules both for Buddhist and for laypeople based on Buddhism. In fact he insisted that the entire Indian subcontinent try to live by Buddhist values. Although he was a devout Buddhist he did not insist that anyone adopted Buddhism unless he or she wanted to.
     What is known is that at one point he was such a wonderful patron of Buddhist monks that many people were starting to pretend that they were Buddhist monks. And he introduced a white robe that these fakers when found had to wear from then on. I think it was probably during this period that Ashoka probably codified the Buddhist robe as its found in southern India and Sri Lanka today. He was in fact personally  responsible for transferring Buddhism to Sri Lanka where the earliest forms of Buddhism were preserved when Buddhism was more or less wiped out on the Indian subcontinent. I think it’s very likely that this Buddhist robe probably introduced by him accompanied the wandering monks that went up and down the silk Road and into China in later years.
   So this wonderful story about Ananda designing the present robe from rice paddies  is probably as likely as the stories of Buddha and 500 of his followers flying around the countryside visiting various kings. Both stories are about as likely. I seriously doubt that two young princes from far northern and northeastern India would have been so overcome with Rice paddies that they would have designed robes based on them.

     Buddhism is over 2500 years old and it has traveled and changed and modified itself with each culture that it has encountered over those 2500 years. The fact is the three-piece robe like most things in Buddhism has been surrounded by myth and mythology for centuries. Few people probably know the arcane symbolism of the Mala that they wear on their wrists or even that a proper one must have three cords not just one if it’s to be a real Mala. The fact is Buddhist monks have been as creative as humans can get and have used robes and Mala's as teaching tools over the years. But like all religious artifacts their true meaning is always as vast and  as miniscule as the minds and faith of the person wearing them.
      If you gather together Buddhists monks and nuns and priests from all over the world you will find a wide variety of robes and beads and symbols. They’ll be colors of red and saffron of black and brown and various mixtures of the same. There are ceremonies in some countries were laypeople in order to get merit contribute cloth for the making of their local monks robes. In some countries certain schools of Buddhism forbade monks and priests from making their own robes simply because they need the income from selling them to them. An example of this is the main Soto school in Japan.
      I’m sure that many monks have sown their own robes, just as I’m sure that many monks robes are sown by their mothers, this after all in most Buddhist countries gives laypeople merit. Most Westerners haven’t got a clue what merit is in Buddhism so they have no idea why this would be so. But the fact is in most countries helping a Buddhist monk is considered to generate good karma for the helper. This good karma is called merit. So in many countries filled full of native Buddhist and not Johnny-come-lately’s would think sewing his own robe would be  a selfish act denying someone the merit they would accrue in doing this unselfish act for the monk.
     I’ve been a Buddhist for about 30 years maybe longer and I have in the last five years seen this robe thing expand exponentially full of myth and good old-fashioned BS. Personally I think robes may be a thing of the past that we could very well do without in the 21st century. Maybe Zen Buddhist priest should all carry iron rods with five rings attached and pound them on the ground as they walk along the road as they used to do in Japan. But I think they would look quite silly today. Sometimes I think that people come to Buddhism simply because they want to put on robes and seem all mystical and stuff. I myself always feel a little silly wearing a full robe and would much prefer a black suit and a black turtleneck. But that’s just me.
     But the one thing that I am sure of is that Buddha said not to get too attached to things and I’m fairly sure that a robe is a thing. It seems to me robes today are being used to make people feel important, to provide income for those who teach the mysticism of the robe, and to make people feel important and quite frankly lord it over other people. Somehow I don’t think this is what Buddha had in mind. 
     I’m going to suggest that if you really want to wear the original Buddha’s robe you get yourself a loincloth. And that’s probably about it. That is what Hindu holy men have worn for 3000 years. But please don’t set up in front of a bunch of gullible people and perpetrate a bunch of BS simply to make yourself feel important and act like you might know more than you do. This isn’t the first time that Buddhist robes were used to impress the natives and instill awe in the gullible and it certainly won’t be the last. But it is the 21st century and this blog will probably be around for a while and you taking a chance it might blow your cover. 
     If you want to start a new school of Buddhism and you’re in the West go ahead. If you want to introduce new traditions go ahead and do that. But please be honest about what you’re doing with others and yourself. Lets just say these robes are a tradition. They are a tradition of our school and of Buddhism.

 


7 comments:

  1. Hi,

    Buddhist robes come in many cuts and colors to suit different climates and traditions. Probably none look exactly like the Buddha's Robes, maybe not even close. Yet, though different, nonetheless perhaps all are precisely the Buddha's Robes. In fact, what makes you think the real Buddha's Robes are limited by cut or color or material? What makes you think that they don't cover all as the "Robe of Liberation Boundless".

    The Buddha's Robes cannot be created, yet we sew them by hand in our Sangha. They are never finished either. They are never perfect (neither are our lives), yet we sew them with diligence to do our best. If worn by a charlatan, the are meaningless. If worn with Wisdom and Compassion, any rags can be Buddha's Robes.

    Perhaps I could extend an invitation to you to come to our Sangha and sew a Robe.

    http://www.treeleaf.org/

    Gassho, Jundo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I appreciate the offer but in my opinion sewing has simply become an excuse not to sit. I suppose as in all skillful means there are those who may find profound awakening while sewing a robe. My Own experience with it was that the sewing teacher gained some income and that was about it. I wish you well and if you find awakening in sewing more power to you. I’m sure your teacher and his teacher also sowed their own robes and that was the very first thing they taught you and if that’s true more power to you . I simply ask that you not try to create a mythology around it with a bunch of BS and inaccurate facts about the history of practice. Awakening can be found with a snap of the twig or the re-citation of a Sutra and I’m sure one day they will be those who will do a double stitch and find profound knowledge I just don’t think I’ll ever be one.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  2. Hi Togen,

    Yes, sewing is just a myth, a story. But the Buddha teaches that all this world and experience of "self" is a myth, a fiction, a story. Thus, one may find the sacred all through the story, including this sewing story. Zazen on the cushion is Zazen, but rising up from the Zafu into life, all work and play, is Zazen too! Thus, much as the Christians find two pieces of wood hammered together as their sacred symbol, we might find this sacred symbol ... a symbol for the "sewing" with errors and imperfections which is all our life. Just today in our forum, one of our members wrote this about sewing through his cancer ...

    "I had a similar experience with my first rakusu.
    Several years ago when I was sewing my first rakusu I was a physical and mental mess due to a bout with cancer. I had come up with all the excuses in the world as to why I could not complete it. ... I finally put the excuses aside and made the sewing part of my daily practice. It was a crude effort, made out of an old hand dyed bed sheet, the stitching was crooked, the fabric was scorched, and in short it was perfectly a mess. ... [which] had so many lessons as it was created. Accepting its imperfections as I learned to accept the imperfections of my body caused by the cancer and its treatment..."

    One finds what one finds.

    Gassho, Jundo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now you are speaking my language, May the Buddha smile upon you and your Sangha my friend.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That's strange... Then how come the Patimokkha/Pratimoksha texts of all Buddhist traditions bears the numerous references to the triple robes? Bear in mind that they began to split up about 100 years after the Gotama Buddha passed away.

    ReplyDelete